On the shop floors of Southern Ontario and the industrial parks ringing Montreal, something that has not happened consistently in years is underway: employers are adding workers to keep pace with orders, not just to replace the ones who left.
The S&P Global Canada Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index held at 53.0 in June, essentially unchanged from 52.9 in May and marking a sixth consecutive month above the 50-point threshold that separates expansion from contraction. Output and new orders both rose for a third straight month. Backlogs grew. And employment, the component of the survey with the most direct bearing on the country's staffing industry, climbed to its highest level since October 2024, as manufacturers expanded payrolls at the fastest pace in a year and a half.
For an industry that has spent much of the past two years absorbing layoffs in warehousing, light industrial, and logistics roles, that is not a small thing.
Reading Past the Headline Number
Economists who track the index caution against treating a single data point, or even six months of them, as confirmation of a durable hiring cycle. The details behind June's reading point to a manufacturing sector expanding for reasons that are not uniformly reassuring.
Export orders fell for the first time in three months, a reversal that analysts tied to the drag of tariffs on demand from Canada's largest trading partner. Supply chain delays worsened to their highest level since September 2022, a deterioration linked to shipping disruptions stemming from the conflict in the Middle East. Input costs accelerated to their fastest pace since July 2022, driven by oil, transportation, and tariff-related expenses. And business confidence, while still positive, slipped to a three-month low amid uncertainty over American trade policy.
In other words, some of the same forces of friction, cost, and geopolitical risk have squeezed manufacturers even as they hire.
For staffing firms, that combination is familiar. Employers under margin pressure from rising input costs tend to lean harder on contingent and agency labor rather than committing to permanent headcount, since temporary placements can be scaled back quickly if conditions sour. A manufacturer facing supply chain uncertainty may prefer to staff up a second shift with agency workers now and reassess in the fall, rather than carry the fixed cost of new full-time employees into a period of tariff-driven uncertainty.
The Employment Number Manufacturers Are Actually Reporting
Paul Smith, economics director at S&P Global Market Intelligence, described the sector's June performance as positive on the surface, with output and new orders supporting a third straight month of employment gains. The output index rose modestly to 52.1 from 52.0, while the employment measure reached 51.9, its best showing since October 2024.
That pattern, gradual and cost-pressured rather than explosive, tends to favor place-and-search and contingent-staffing models over direct-hire recruitment. Firms adding headcount cautiously, with an eye on tariff exposure and input costs, are the same firms inclined to test demand with temporary placements before converting roles to permanent positions.
What It Means for Bill Rates
Rising input cost inflation complicates the picture for staffing agencies in a more mechanical way: it squeezes the margin between what a client is willing to pay per hour and what an agency can bill. When manufacturers are absorbing near-four-year highs in their own cost base, largely a function of oil, transport, and tariffs, according to the survey, they tend to resist bill-rate increases from staffing partners even as they add positions. Agencies serving the manufacturing vertical may find themselves adding volume without proportionate gains in revenue per placement.
The broader pattern is not unique to June. April's PMI reading of 53.3, up sharply from 50.0 in March, was driven in part by client stockpiling tied to fears over product availability and the Middle East conflict, a dynamic that inflated new orders without necessarily reflecting durable end demand. If that stockpiling unwinds later this year, the employment gains built on top of it could prove temporary, an outcome staffing firms that have added recruiters and account managers against the current pipeline will be watching closely.
This post is for free and paying subscribers only
Subscribe now for free and have access to all our stories, enjoy exclusive content and stay up to date with constant updates.
Already a member? Sign in