For decades, permanent placements were the lifeblood of the staffing industry: reliable, lucrative, and central to how firms measured success. Each hire placed into a long-term role meant stability for clients and strong margins for agencies. But that foundation is cracking. Across North America and Europe, the traditional direct hire business is losing altitude, squeezed between new technologies, employer insourcing, outsourcing, and a profound change in how companies think about risk.

A Model Under Pressure

The signals are impossible to ignore. Hiring freezes have multiplied, employers are relying more on internal talent teams, and recruitment process outsourcing (RPO) providers have stepped into spaces once reserved for traditional firms. Digital job platforms and AI-driven sourcing tools have made direct hiring cheaper and faster, eroding the value proposition of human intermediaries. Even the world’s largest staffing firms are re-evaluating their strategies. Randstad’s chief executive recently urged the company to “skate where the puck is going,” acknowledging that the playbook built on permanent placements no longer guarantees growth.

At the macro level, advanced economies are stuck in what economists call a “low-hire, low-fire” cycle; a state in which both hiring and layoffs remain muted. In such an environment, the demand for permanent recruitment naturally softens. In Canada, the office staffing and temp agency sector is expected to reach north of 10 billion in 2025, yet growth over the past five years has been virtually flat. Temporary and contract staffing continue to inch forward, but the high margin world of direct hire is stagnating.

The Structural Shift

Some of the downturn can be blamed on economic uncertainty, but much of it is structural. Employers that invested heavily in recruitment technology during the pandemic have learned to operate with less external support. Internal recruiters now use AI matching tools, data dashboards, and talent marketing platforms once reserved for agencies. Those efficiencies are permanent. When the next recovery begins, companies will not suddenly dismantle their new capabilities to return to the old model.

In the same way, digital hiring marketplaces and social platforms have lowered the cost of access to talent. The middleman’s role has changed, perhaps irreversibly. And as organizations expand contingent work arrangements and hybrid contracts, the notion of “permanent” employment itself is losing relevance. Fewer employers want to commit long term; more want to keep options open.

A Cyclical Rebound... on a Lower Baseline

Yet it would be wrong to declare the end of permanent hiring altogether. When the economy stabilizes, direct hire volumes will almost certainly rise again. History suggests that after every downturn, employers eventually rebuild their teams to lock in talent and continuity. But the next rebound will likely be shallower and shorter-lived than previous ones.

This post is for paying subscribers only

Subscribe now and have access to all our stories, enjoy exclusive content and stay up to date with constant updates.

Subscribe now

Already a member? Sign in